Thinking

Differently

“You can't look at the competition and say you're going to do it better. You have to look at the competition and say you're going to do it differently.” - Steve Jobs

How Does 169to1 Compare?

Thinking Differently | 169to1
169to1® Thinking Differently

Real impact. Real access.Real value.

169to1 is built to be scalable, accessible and radically effective. The alternatives are bloated, expensive or exclusive, and often all three. Here is how the platform sits against six other global initiatives in sustainability, education and impact verification.

Comparison valid as of 29 June 2026

7Initiatives compared
169Targets addressed
£12Lowest entry price
4Offer any credential

Part one

The comparison

Four things decide whether an SDG initiative changes what an organisation actually does: how much of the framework it covers, whether it drives action or only awareness, whether the action can be evidenced afterwards, and what it costs to get in. The table reads on those four.

Offered by the model Not offered by the model Verdict: partial fit
Platform or model Goals covered Activation Digital credentials Typical cost per year Verdict
01169to1®Target-level decision platform All 17, opened to 169 targets Yes Yes, via Certifier £12 to £1,499Training included at no cost High value, all-sector fit
02Eco-SchoolsCertification scheme for schools Environmental only Yes Yes £730 to £860 Strong for schools, limited scope
03Outcomes Star™Outcomes measurement tool Custom frameworks only Reflective Internal only From £255Plus training costs Strong for services, not SDG-wide
04World’s Largest LessonTeaching resources All 17 One-off None Free Awareness-focused, not strategic
05UN SDG AcademyCourse library All 17 Passive None FreePaid certificates optional Academic, no follow-up structure
06En-ROADS Climate SimulatorSimulation tool SDG 13 only Simulated None Free Useful tool, narrow scope
07B Corp CertificationWhole-company certification Business practice only Operational Yes £1,600 to £40,000 High cost, narrow use case

How to read the costs. These are published annual figures at the comparison date. Every range covers a span of entity sizes, so the bottom of one range and the top of another are rarely the same buyer. A single teacher and a global manufacturer sit at opposite ends of the same row.

Part two

Key takeaways

Three conclusions come out of the table. The first is a claim about price. The other two are about what the money buys.

As of 2026

169to1 ranks first for cost-effectiveness

On four criteria taken together:

  • Affordability
  • Breadth of SDG coverage
  • Built-in activation and verification
  • Multi-sector accessibility
The paid alternatives

They work, for a subset

B Corp and Eco-Schools do their job well within their own boundaries. Both are built for one kind of organisation, and both cost considerably more to enter. Neither is available to a user who falls outside the model.

The free alternatives

They inform, then stop

The SDG Academy and World’s Largest Lesson are genuinely useful and cost nothing. Neither is structured for action or for recognition, so the learning has nowhere to go once the course ends.

Everything in the table teaches the 17 goals or certifies a company. Nothing else in it hands you one of the 169 targets and asks what you are going to do about that one.

Part three

Why we lead

One structure runs the whole platform, and every part of it exists to move a user from a choice to a claim that holds up.

Pricing

Built to fit schools, NGOs, SMEs and youth programmes, which is why entry starts at a figure an individual can pay.

Free licences

On purchase, an SME can nominate local academic institutions to receive a licence at no cost. The commercial buyer decides who else gets in.

Verification

Every target carries a verifiable digital badge, so an activated target leaves a record that someone outside your organisation can check.

The difference

You do not just learn about the SDGs here. You deliver against them. A global framework, worked at local scale.

169to1 is fully independent of the United Nations. Every organisation named above is independent of 169to1 and the marks belong to their respective owners. Costs, coverage and features are as published at the comparison date and are summarised for comparison; check with each provider before relying on a figure. All verdicts are 169to1’s own editorial judgement and carry no endorsement from any body named.

© 2026 169to1® – Originally developed by Hudson Consultancy Online. Licensed for internal use. Redistribution or resale prohibited.

Competition isn’t always about being better, but about showing the way for others to follow.